When I read on Facebook that one of my friends was annoyed at the fact that the Occupy London Stock exchange movement were camped out at St Paul’s Cathedral I immediately leapt to their defence, since I know some people who were there. I was told that they were forced to St. Paul’s by police. Canon Fraser told the police that the protestors were more than welcome to stay there.
I saw this and thought that some of it made a point. Particularly this:
‘Those assholes almost destroyed our economy. Do you remember the feeling of panic? John McCain wanted to suspend the presidential campaign so that everybody could focus on the crisis. Hallowed financial institutions like Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch went belly up. The government started intervening with bailouts, not because anybody thought “private profits and socialized losses” was fair, but because we were afraid not to intervene – we were afraid our whole economy might come crashing down around us if we didn’t prop up companies that were “too big to fail.”
So, even though you and I had nothing to do with the bad decisions, blind greed and incompetence of those guys on Wall Street, we were sure as hell along for the ride, weren’t we? And we’ve all paid a price.
All the” 99%” wants is for you to remember the role that Wall Street played in creating this mess, and for you to join us in demanding that Wall Street share the pain. They don’t want to share the pain, and they’re spending a lot of money and twisting a lot of arms to foist their share of the pain on the rest of us instead. And they’ve been given unprecedented powers to spend and twist, and they’re not even trying to hide what they’re doing.’
Which to me makes total sense.
I have seen the initial statement that the Occupy London Stock Exchange have made.
It seems to me that for different people it means so many different things, and this is where their weakness, and strength is. I think that some of the points they make are extremely valid and this is why the movement has so much support. There is something in their initial statement which every person agrees with. You don’t have to agree with it all, but there will be at least one point which you think that they’re right about.
I read this on the Guardian website that ‘People always impatiently ask what the occupiers’ “demands” are, and why collectively they seem unwilling, or unable to provide quick-fix solutions. These questions miss the point. First, there are lots of occupiers, all from different social and political backgrounds, who understandably need time to thrash out what it is they want to achieve together. The camp gives them that time. Second, if there’s one thing that does unite almost all of them, it’s their rejection of capitalism – although they are wary of how they couch this. Nevertheless, a huge “capitalism is crisis” banner hangs over the entrance to the site…’
So if capitalism isn’t the answer then what is? Communism? Because for me, that isn’t the answer at all.
And my friend made another good point. Because of the protestors, St. Paul’s cathedral is now closed until further notice, which is a real shame. They have requested that the protestors leave the area so that they can re-open.
While I agree with some of the points made by the 99% movement and occupy London, I think it’s very difficult to implement change, and it begs the question – what will this protest really achieve? And what will they do next?